It being a warm, sunny day yesterday, I opted to eat my lunchtime
sandwich while sitting on a low wall near a parking lot of the community
college across the street from where I work. There was a light amount of foot
traffic passing by, mostly the late-teens and twenty-somethings that comprise
the majority of the college’s student population. From a distance I could see two
figures who did not represent that population, though. Their distinctive white
shirts, short-cut hair, and name tags gave their identity away, along with the
fact that there were two of them. They’re always in pairs.
I watched as
they greeted students who walked past, asking if they could give them a
brochure. Of course they stopped to chat with me. One asked if I was having a
good day. “So far, so good,” I replied. Then the other asked if I was a student
or teacher at the college. Good tact,
I thought. Being mistaken for a student
always makes me feel a little good about myself, even if that’s not what the
speaker intended. I replied that I worked at the language school across the
street. He then informed me that they worked at a school across the street,
too, pointing to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints training
facility on the other side of the parking lot.
The young men
were very friendly and pleasant, although one of them did most of the talking.
Of course the conversation quickly steered toward “the prophet.” The chatty one
asked me if I thought it was possible for God to call a prophet for our modern times.
I replied that I believe it is possible for God to call whomever God wants and
whenever God wants for whatever purposes God decides. They seemed to like that
answer. When they inquired more about my faith, I explained that I am a deacon
in the Presbyterian church. We talked about Presbyterian missionaries and their
terms of service. We talked a little bit about what Presbyterians believe and
so on. They invited me to a meeting where I could learn more about “the
prophet.” I politely declined.
By that time
I had about ten minutes left before I needed to be back at work, so we amicably
parted. Later, as I reflected on the conversation, I wished that I had thought
to ask these young men some questions: Why does only one of you do most of the
talking? How often do you get to call or write home to your family? Why don’t I
ever see black or brown-skinned Mormon missionaries? Or overweight Mormon
missionaries, for that matter? Why does your church hate LGBT people so much? And
why do you keep talking about “the prophet” when your church is called the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints? Why not talk about Jesus and His
message more? And do you really wear
special undergarments that have been blessed by your church’s leadership?
Then my
thoughts turned to other religious people practicing their faith—or obeying
their religion’s mandates—in public places: the Salvation Army in their
pseudo-military getups; the Muslim men wearing beards and robes and head
dressings, tabling on the sidewalk on the campus; the Jehovah’s Witnesses,
looking like the rest of us until they whip out those Watchtowers; there are
even a few bare-headed, robed, tambourine-shaking Hare Krishnas leftover from
the 1970s here and there, at least in California. There are no pretenses with all
these people. You know who you’re talking to when you see them, or at least once
you see what kind of literature they’re holding in their hands. And while I don’t
personally agree with all of their religion’s precepts, as long as they
proclaim a message of peace and love, I can tolerate them as long as they
tolerate me.
It’s when the
messages stray from peace and love to practices of exclusion, thought control,
domination and submission—an “us vs. them” attitude—that I begin to have a
problem with these or any religion’s practices. This morning there was a story
online of the Salvation Army’s public service campaign in South Africa to raise
awareness of domestic violence. The ad showed a pretty white female model
wearing the now-famous white and gold/blue and black dress of recent internet popularity. The
model was covered with bruises, and the caption asks why it's so hard to see black and blue (you can see the ad here). I inwardly applauded their noble efforts to
help put an end to this detestable practice, but I quickly stopped my clapping
when I saw a related story
about how the Salvation Army had possibly denied long-term shelter to a homeless transgendered
woman. Where’s the love of Christ there? Are attractive white females more worthy of God’s grace than homeless individuals who
don’t fit the Salvation Army’s definition of womanhood?
My finger of
blame may be pointing to the Salvation Army, Mormons, and other groups who
claim to be a part of the body of Christ, but there are three other fingers
pointed right back at myself. I grew up in a strict, predominantly white,
Southern-rooted Christian denomination that still doesn’t ordain women as
pastors or deacons, still doesn’t allow a divorced man to serve as a pastor or
deacon, still condemns dancing, drinking alcohol, and playing cards, and would
not tolerate a “practicing homosexual” to worship in their midst (Lord only
knows what they’d do with a transgendered individual). This denomination is
very male-dominated, patriotic, and focused on the avoidance of sin. I was
taught that if a person died before asking God to forgive them of a particular
sin, that person would go to Hell. Although I have traveled far from that black-and-white,
rules-bound upbringing in my own faith journey, the evil spirits of judgment
and labeling, of the “us vs. them” mentality, are hard to exorcise. It’s just
that now my “them” are the people whose practices show disrespect for
diversity, disregard for the environment, ostracization of the outcast,
idolization of country and military might and weapons—basically all the things
I am now against. But I know in my heart of hearts that I have such a problem
with “them” because I was once them, ignorant and living in spiritual darkness,
and inside my soul some of that darkness still struggles against the Light.
Jesus, the
model for my faith, loved everybody, even—and perhaps especially—those who
persecuted him. And therein lies my struggle: it’s easy to love those who are
like me, who agree with me socio-politically and theologically, who follow
lifestyles similar to my own. It’s much harder to love those who are different
from me, and the more different they are, the harder it is to love them. The
labels for them come just as easily as those in my more conservative days:
before, the terms “non-Christian” and “non-believer” encompassed anybody who
didn’t fit my worldview, from Communists to liberals to feminists to gays to
pacifists; now the labels are Islamophobes, homophobes, misogynists, gun
worshipers, nationalists, warmongers, capitalists, and anything else that doesn’t
fit my current worldview. I’m just as judgmental as before; it’s just that now I’ve
stepped over the line and turned my lens back on the ones I used to stand with,
years ago. What I really need to do is turn that lens on myself, get the “plank”
out of my own eye in order to better see the “splinter” in my fellow human
being’s eye.
I posted a meme on my personal
Facebook page recently, but I posted it as private because I was afraid that
many of my conservative Facebook friends would judge me (How ironic, the judger
is afraid of being judged!). It stated, “Buddha was not Buddhist. Jesus was not
Christian. Muhammad was not Muslim. They were teachers who taught love. Love
was their religion.” I liked this meme for several reasons: First, Jesus was
not a Christian. He was a Jew. Many Christians throughout history and today
conveniently ignore that fact. He worshiped in Jewish synogogues and temples,
appointed a rough-around-the-edges Jewish fisherman to be the cornerstone of His
community of followers, yet welcomed Gentiles, tax collectors, prostitutes,
diseased people, and anybody else into His community, never once telling them
that they had to become Jews, or even addressing the religious beliefs of those
individuals. His message was all about simply turning to God and living in loving
relationship with God and other people. In Jesus’ definition, sin was anything
that kept one from loving God, loving others, and loving self completely. Yet
like many of our Jewish spiritual forebears, we Christians (and many Muslims,
too) became focused on identifying the particular sins of others; we became
like the Pharisee in Jesus’ parable, publicly proclaiming how thankful he was
that he was not like the nearby unrighteous tax collector. We became self-righteous
by deflecting our unrighteousness onto those who did not conform to our own
unrealistic expectations of righteousness. Like me, we judge others because we
are too uncomfortable judging ourselves—or perhaps because we judge ourselves
too harshly and can’t handle the resulting burden of guilt?
Second, I
feel that Christians have misjudged Buddha and Muhammad throughout the years. Buddhists
are labeled as idol worshipers, while Muslims are labeled as expansionists and
terrorists. Think about how Christians are labeled in many countries and cultures
around the world based on the actions of some of those who profess to follow Christ.
We are called warmongers, imperialists, and murderers because of what we have
done in the name of Christ. What blasphemy against Christ’s name we have
committed and continue to commit!
I do not want
to end this blog without acknowledging the Christians, Jews, Muslims, Mormons,
Salvation Army members, and others around the world who are united in their
efforts to expand their particular group’s views into a more loving embrace of
God’s people everywhere. These are the people who advocate for worldwide peace
and nonviolence; who work for equity and fairness for the working poor and
charity for those who cannot work; who not only invite members of the LGBT
community into their fold, but affirm their identities and marriage commitments
to each other; who seek to learn from, and not fear, other religious
traditions; who respect all gender identities, all sexes, all races and
nationalities and ethnicities and intellectual and physical abilities as being
of equal value in God’s sight; who simply seek to love God with their whole
being, and love others as they love themselves. I want to be like that. I want
my only label to be “kind and loving person.” For if God truly is love, as 1
John 4:8 proclaims, then those who fit the label of kind and loving person must
surely be a child of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.